Basho Reviews : Iron Man

Basho Reviews : Iron Man

May 2, 2008  |  General
closeThis post was pub­lished over 700 days ago and there­fore may not rep­res­ent cur­rent Out­side Con­text think­ing or opin­ion. Please, do not let that detract from your enjoy­ment of it!

Last night Kiero and I went out to watch the Pre­view show­ing of Iron Man at Odeon Leicester Square.

Many will say that Iron Man is a very simple story. That the plot is essen­tially simple to spot. That the char­ac­ters are all thin and obvi­ous and the action is split very firmly along action genre stand­ards. This, they will lament, is a film with a firm begin­ning, a plod­ding middle and a tra­di­tion­ally ram­bunc­tious end.  Just like every other comic book pro­ject found in the cinema these days.  Iron Man, they will claim, is a TV series epis­ode with nine times the budget.  Yet another slice of nothing.

Oth­ers, of a more lit­er­ary bent, may even point put that sum­mer block­busters are ten a penny these days and thus Iron Man is simply the next in the line of the decayed fetuses torn from the womb of Marvel’s back-catalogue, which is being repeatedly corpse-humped until all our child­hood memor­ies have been force fed back to us in lurid CGI. An ima­gin­at­ive morsel that can never com­pare to the gigantic spec­tacles our minds evoked back when we were young.

All those people are idiots.

image

Of course it’s shallow.

Of course it’s char­ac­ters are paper thin.

Of course the plot-twists are simple to spot.

Of course there is a thump­ing sound track.

Of course the action is over the top.

It’s a comic book!

Cap­tur­ing the Zeit­geist is a hard busi­ness these days. If you are design­ing a pro­ject that is going to try and present “near-future” tech, what with the time the pro­ject will take to pro­duce and the ever quick­en­ing pace of con­sumer tech­no­logy, you are presen­ted with a fine bal­an­cing act. Push too far for­wards and you will come off like an epis­ode of Guyver. Hold back too hard and the audi­ence will likely have bet­ter tech in their iPhones.  Many approaches have been attemp­ted to pull off con­vin­cing sci-fi and not all have been successful.

imageFor every Star Wars, which clev­erly made everything broken-down and old (Thus the tag line of Epis­ode IV is “A long Time ago in a Galaxy far far away” even though the ships all fly faster than light), you get a Tomor­row Never Dies (that exec­rable invis­ible car!). Iron man bal­ances this tricky equa­tion almost to per­fec­tion. So while the suit is amaz­ing it is amaz­ing in the ‘concept car’ sense. The move­ments and tech­no­logy on dis­play are just far enough ahead to make you go “wow”, but not too far ahead that you don’t believe it.

That is not the only prob­lem that must have faced the writers of this story. More press­ing is how could they inject a human touch into a big Iron Suit which has a blank look­ing mask? How could they inject enough char­ac­ter into the design so that we identify with it? For this they rely on the body move­ments of the arms and legs with little touches like the Stark’s hands clench­ing in anger caus­ing an actual reac­tion in the suits mech­an­isms. Such as weapons slowly slid­ing into view or power­ing up.

In this way the emo­tion of the wearer is passed across. It is quite subtle and yet adds a lot to the action scenes and is a test­a­ment to the qual­ity of 3d CGI in 2008.

For all non-action scenes you have an excel­lent cast who all know their jobs. Much will be made of Robert Downey Jr as Stark, and I will get to him in a moment, but I want to give big props’ to an excel­lent Jeff Bridges who plays the Vil­lain very con­vin­cingly. His amaz­ing beard and some clever film angles that enhance his phys­ical size and pres­ence are so effect­ive that he steals almost every scene he is in. Gwyneth Pal­trow is also every bit her part. I.E. office-girl-sexy and yet unob­tain­able. In this char­ac­ter they again have made some­thing that most of us are more than famil­iar with.  It sounds easy to do but actu­ally she has a lot of under­act­ing to per­form here. She has to give up space to the hero.

The hero is Robert Downey Jr as Tony Stark.

image Cast­ing is a dif­fi­cult job. The wrong cast­ing can ruin the flow of a film. Think of the clunky act­ing of Katie Holmes in Bat­man Begins. Think of Hay­den Christensen in Epis­ode II/III. Robert Downey Jr as Tony Stark is an inspired choice. He has the un-fakable look of a man who has been to the edge. A man who could quite believ­ably cre­ate an empire large enough to sup­port the devel­op­ment of Iron Man. His deliv­ery of the lines are all pitch per­fect (two strong gins per­fect). He is always cool and relaxed but under­neath he is still wired. This is not some­thing you can fake.  Look at act­ors in The Mat­rix Revolu­tions try to act cool but fail.

Stark’s legend is based on that of Howard Hughes and this les­son has been updated to the 2000’s with Stark liv­ing the “per­fect” life.  Comic hero’s are all about repressed wish ful­fill­ment fantas­ies and the dir­ector of this movie knew that from the begin­ning.  He presents Stark as a “mag­ni­fi­cent bas­tard”.  Someone lar­ger than life who is liv­ing the Amer­ican Dream life of babes, toys, booze and all the money you can stick in your ears.  He then simply redir­ects that energy into becom­ing a hero.  This trans­form­a­tion is FAR more con­vin­cing than cheaper fare such as Jumper or even Spi­der­man (which I couldn’t stand).

Stark is every inch a genius play­boy. That genius is awoken to save his life and like any obsess­ive the sub­sequent improved suit designs are his search for redemp­tion through the pur­suit of per­fec­tion (Howard Hughes to a T).  This is all very close to the comic book and no real liber­ties have been taken with the story even where that leads to plot-lite.  It is all much more con­vin­cing than Fant­astic 4 or even X-Men.  Maybe it’s that I can believe in a suit whereas super­powers leave me cold.  Stark has a super­power of course: his intel­li­gence, but that is on the inside and doesn’t require a span­dex jump­suit with under­pants on the outside.

Watch­ing Iron Man is an exer­cise in reliv­ing one’s child­hood. It is fun and excit­ing in equal meas­ure, how­ever it is def­in­itely a film to watch on the big screen. I found it to be an excel­lent movie and I had great fun watch­ing it. It is also a very wel­come start to this year’s prom­ising lineup.  There’s a new Indy, a New Bat­man and, to kick 2008 off, a very good comic adapt­a­tion in Iron Man.

I give it 8/10

Basho

Related Posts

 

Leave a Reply

blog comments powered by Disqus