<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Children of Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidecontext.com/2006/09/23/children-of-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidecontext.com/2006/09/23/children-of-men/</link>
	<description>Travel writing, reviews, philosophy and airsoft</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidecontext.com/2006/09/23/children-of-men/#comment-12098</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidecontext.com/2006/09/23/children-of-men/#comment-12098</guid>
		<description>I have had to think back to when I wrote this to consider why I put it that way. The bombs were not just planted by Muslims, they were the Muslims. The act was intensely religious on their part, strapping high explosives to themselves and blowing it up in public is that much more extreme than merely blowing up a bag left on the train. These were people. The other aspect I considered was how frightened we have become of the supra overloaded word &quot;terrorist&quot;. We call almost anything terrorism now from bombs to website posting secrets. It has become an empty word. At the time I remember that I wasn&#039;t &quot;terrorised&quot;  at all, just unhappy that people have died, angry that it had got to this, and determined not to be scared by it all.

So, I take your comment onboard, but these were &quot;people bombs&quot;, these people were Muslims, and so they were Muslim bombs: as much as that doesn&#039;t scan as well as &quot;terrorist&quot;.

Basho</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had to think back to when I wrote this to consider why I put it that way. The bombs were not just planted by Muslims, they were the Muslims. The act was intensely religious on their part, strapping high explosives to themselves and blowing it up in public is that much more extreme than merely blowing up a bag left on the train. These were people. The other aspect I considered was how frightened we have become of the supra overloaded word &#8220;terrorist&#8221;. We call almost anything terrorism now from bombs to website posting secrets. It has become an empty word. At the time I remember that I wasn&#8217;t &#8220;terrorised&#8221;  at all, just unhappy that people have died, angry that it had got to this, and determined not to be scared by it all.</p>
<p>So, I take your comment onboard, but these were &#8220;people bombs&#8221;, these people were Muslims, and so they were Muslim bombs: as much as that doesn&#8217;t scan as well as &#8220;terrorist&#8221;.</p>
<p>Basho</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: filmfan</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidecontext.com/2006/09/23/children-of-men/#comment-12097</link>
		<dc:creator>filmfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidecontext.com/2006/09/23/children-of-men/#comment-12097</guid>
		<description>muslim bombs, are you serious??? the bombs were by terrorists, the so they were terrorist bombs. better choice of words</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>muslim bombs, are you serious??? the bombs were by terrorists, the so they were terrorist bombs. better choice of words</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jigsaw hc</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidecontext.com/2006/09/23/children-of-men/#comment-8715</link>
		<dc:creator>Jigsaw hc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidecontext.com/2006/09/23/children-of-men/#comment-8715</guid>
		<description>Children of Men was a really good movie.  I&#039;d probably give it a 9/10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Children of Men was a really good movie.  I&#8217;d probably give it a 9/10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jigsaw hc</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidecontext.com/2006/09/23/children-of-men/#comment-11519</link>
		<dc:creator>Jigsaw hc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidecontext.com/2006/09/23/children-of-men/#comment-11519</guid>
		<description>Children of Men was a really good movie.  I&#039;d probably give it a 9/10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Children of Men was a really good movie.  I&#8217;d probably give it a 9/10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 341/343 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.outsidecontext.com @ 2012-02-11 12:10:21 -->
